Vienna Penal Code 1988: § 278: banding
who connects with 2 or more, with the intent that one or more members of this compound continued murders (§ 75) or other serious acts of violence against life and limb, extortionate kidnapping (§ 102), traditions of a foreign power (§ 103), the slave trade (§ 104), robbery (§ 142), extortion (§ 144); dangerous to, criminal acts under § 169, 171, 173, 176, 185 or 186 or human beings (§ 217) offenses against the security of transportation of money, securities and valuables (§ § 232 to 239) or only minor property damage, theft or fraud be performed shall be punished with imprisonment up to three years.
Has the connection led to any criminal act of the kind proposed, it is not in the content, to punish, if the compound dissolved voluntarily or otherwise from their behavior shows that it has voluntarily given up their plans ...
ask many supporters of animal rights activists even an acquittal on all 62 or 63 counts of animal rights. We obtained an acquittal in Austria but not so easy, particularly because the prosecutor's office and they are subject to directives with false information which supplied SOKO animal protection to the admittedly corrupt politicians and officials in the Ministry of Justice and Ministry of Home Affairs. I can unfortunately not that I have to live in such a country! I did not invent this system.
Now on acquittal , stepping back from the dock or some charges:
Ad ACQUITTED: An acquittal will make the decision in Wiener Neustadt little. Why: Because the indictment by the prosecutor handler contains more than 62 charges. This means that more than 60 crimes accused the animal rights activists. The hardest hits of course, the main accused DDr. Martin Balluch. Even after taking all
legal sophistication by attorney Mag Stefan Traxler an acquittal of 62 counts is hardly possible because the prosecution then - admit to admit / - highly embarrassing would it
first coarsest procedural defects (ranging from the influence of the special commission of animal welfare and the underground judge by the textile entrepreneurs to perfidious embezzlement of exculpatory results of investigations) has been
second the State Office for State Protection and Counter-Terrorism and the Federal Ministry of the Interior for a public relations strategy of Austrian textile chain (which is fighting economic survival) has had abuse (many, many years of abuse by police and judiciary)
BEFORE JUDGEMENT in Wiener Neustadt therefore seek the following: first
The competent prosecutor must be received withdraw after the hijack of the VE by the prosecution under § 278a . Some alleged crimes, such as vandalism, may then be clarified within a very short time in the process.
second Should not happen, the parent bodies in the (instructions linked) prosecution would be required. Ultimately responsible is the Minister of Justice. If they tolerate a further prosecution under § 278a, it would explain why that is justified. (Resulting in motion of no confidence against Justice Minister at the National Council)
third The embezzlement of intelligence by the Federal and State Office for State Protection and Counter-Terrorism MUST have criminal consequences, to pre-emptively to prevent a similar approach. There were already facts representations against Soko and the prosecutor introduced for abuse of authority.
AFTER JUDGEMENT, only more of a plea of nullity be introduced. The Supreme Court can annul the verdict so only because of formal errors, if my information is correct. However, the process is extremely expensive when it is shifted to the highest authority, because all legal costs, etc. .. doubled and tripled! (See Attorney Tariff Act BZS. Regulation)
For further information on current issues of the Penal Code and the Code of Criminal Procedure, see www.ris.bka.gv.at
0 comments:
Post a Comment